If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the " innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers? 3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ? ), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in this article 3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not being on the passenger lists? What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched,and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ? 3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm 3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm 3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm 3:9http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/still_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html 3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm 3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/ 3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html 3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml 3.15 http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html 3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm 3.18 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?coll=chi-news-hed
According to this article 3:11 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves - unless they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns, knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the airport security cameras, and were not on the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside the airport ( last minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly the things! ) and then crashed the planes in breath taking displays of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times! ), where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse doping scandals.