Pentagon 9/11 enhanced attack photos - hole too small
Clean cut building, no broken connecting steel gurters or
rebar.
It appears that none of the concrete structure was connected to the
collapsed part of the building.
Only wires and plumbing seem to be broken, and some minor damage to
the walls face.

Photo of roof gable sagging about 1 foot ( post impact, but
pre-collapse )

The black circle in the photo below shows point of
impact.
This is before the collapse of the wall. Where are the wings,
where is the plane?
Where is the damage to the wall from
the wings (except a small indent in the blue circle, but this can
be explained in that the floor underneath was damaged, and the
whole section was about to collapse)
The bottom floor seems to have taken on much more damage than the
second or third floors, which is where the wing should have hit. If
the bottom floor is damaged more, then the plane would have had to
hit low, if it did hit low, it would have damaged (or demolished)
the cable reels.
If it totally disintegrated the pane, then why did it barely
scratch the cable reels?

The lower support structures, or columbs in the picture
above, shows that they seem to be pushed OUTWARD. If the planes
wing hit them, one would expect them to be pushed IN.
The point of impact was just above and to the right of the persons
head in the photo below.
The plane came in at an angle, and if it hit the ground AT ALL, it
would have demolished the 4 cable spools in the photo
below.


In the pic bleow, the cirlce shows the point of impact, it is
obvious that a Boeing cannot fit into that hole. Use the windows (
arrows point to UNBROKEN windows) to get an idea of the
relationship to the size of the hole.

The tail of plane should have hit above the impact hole, but
clearly, there was no damage to the area above the hole.
The tail should have hit up to the third, or even fourth floor.
The windows are still intact at this point.
A Boeing 757 is about 20-25 ft wide (fuselage) about 150ft long and
over 150ft wing tip to wing tip. The tail section is 40ft tall.
Where is the Plane ? It surely did not squeeze into that small hole
shown. Given a standard 4ft wide window size the opening here is 16
to 18ft. (and YES this is only a guess, I do not have the actual
size on hand), but go to your closest window and measure it.
The columns are about 10ft apart (give or take 1-2 inches). So this
hole is no more than 20ft wide.
The columns on each side of the hole do NOT seem to be seriously
damaged.
This is where the "wing root" would have hit. Probabally the
strogest section of the plane.

Notice no damage to the area above the hole where the
tail section should have hit.
What happened to this tail section? It should have sheared off and
fell to the ground at this point.
as you can seeit did not.
(extreme hi res photos of the Pentagon wall and damage
area)
Central point of explosion. The gas tanks are located on
the outer part of the wings of a Boeing 757 or 767.
The tanks are about 90ft apart. What caused the central explosion ?
Why were there not two explosions on either side where the gas
tanks were ?
http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttack.shtml

The "F" above indicates the gas tanks (Fuel)
Simplified site to show the major problems of the idea that a
757 hit the Pentagon.
Pentagon 911
analysis. Plane, missile or
Pentagon
Graphics simulations and trajectory models.
Response
to
snopes.com pentagon "rumor" 9-11
Links
911review sites
Never cease in the fight for peace, justice, and equality for
all people. Be perisitent in all that you do and don't allow anyone
to sway you from your conscience. ---Leonard Peltier