SmallNukes

From 911Encyclopedia:

On December 5th, 2001, Chossudovsky,Michel, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa, released his article "Tactical Nuclear Weapons" against Afghanistan? , in which he proved, that the United States used GBU-28 "bunker buster bombs" capable of creating large scale underground explosions. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO112C.html

While the Pentagon's "Big Ones" are classified as "conventional weapons", the official statements fail to mention that the same "bunker buster bombs" launched from a B-52, a B-2 stealth bomber or an F-16 aircraft can be equipped with a nuclear device. The B61-11 is the " nuclear version" of its "conventional" BLU-113 counterpart. Only one week, after Chossudovskys article became more popular on the internet, Bush announced to withdraw from the AbmTreaty, on the same day, when the Reagan-Files supposed to had been released. Compare: http://www.nukewatch.org/nwd/weaponsfactsheet.html "Mininukes" and low-yield weapons: "..Future new design work will likely center on low-yield weapons in the five kilotons or below range (including so-called "mini-nukes"). These weapons would inherently be more dangerous because they are more likely to be used. The Warner-Allard provision of the FY 2001 Senate Defense Authorization Bill required DOE to undertake mini-nuke research and development, a direction that has been legislatively barred since 1994 (funding for that provision was not appropriated in House/Senate conference). How a mini nuke can be used: (See Thermobarics)