![]() |
Oil |
| 9/11Encyclopedia | FrontPage | TitleIndex | WordIndex | SiteNavigation | Search |
From 9/11 Encyclopedia:
"The purpose of U.S. engagement, as espoused in the NSS, is to protect the United States' vital interest in the region - uninterrupted, secure U.S./Allied access to Gulf oil." Pentagon, US Government milnet.com/milnet/pentagon/centcom/chap1/stratgic.htm#USPolicy
"We're hostage to oil, that's as simple as you can put it. We have let the economic considerations take precedence" Larry Johnson, former CIA officer "Al-Quaeda is always there, where the oil is, even in Asia or South America" Anonymous Netizen
From 1949 to 1972, the demand for oil increased by five and a
half times in the USA, by 15 times in Western Europe and by 137
times in Japan. The hydrocarbon society was born and developed
through the 50s, 60s and 70s. The petrochemicals industry converts
the oil molecule into clothes, food and fertilisers, added to the
value of oil as a raw material of importance for energy and trade
strategies. In 1971, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries. Opec, was established. Two years later, came the world's
first oil boycott, as a part of the so-called Yom-Kippur war
between Israel and Egypt in October 1973. The signal to the world
was a clear one. Oil was cast into power politics and it is still
there as a global power in itself. To understand, why the so called
"war on terrorism" is in reality a war on oil, which needed an
official startup (September 11), one has to examine the different
positions of Chevron Texaco, BP
Amoco, SOCAR, Exxon
Mobil, British Gas, Agip, Conoco Phillips
/Phillips Petroleum the
Norwegian Statoil, TotalFinaElf, Russia LukOil/LukArco,
GasProm
of
Ex-Premier Tschernomyrdin, Kaz Munai Gaz in
Kazakhstan, Mitsui of Japan
and a few more. 1,200 oil Investment companies and manufacturers of
oil equipment are competing on the oil of the Middle East, the
Norwayan-Russian North Sea, the Caspian Sea and other worldwide sea
parts. Very important is the history of russia since 1996 or better
the story of Chalva Tchigirinksi, who is one of the directors of
Sibir Energy plc, which has its headquarter in Moscow
( sibirenergy.com/corporate/directory/)
Mr. Tchigirinski is the representative of the largest shareholder in Sibir. In this capacity he is a Director of Yugraneft, a Director of both Evikhon and Salym Petroleum Development NV. He is President of both Moscow Oil Company and Central Fuel Company (which controls the Moscow refinery) neither of which are in competition with Sibir. His interests in the sector include a key role in British Petroleum's impressive fuel retail network in Moscow. Sibir Energy is a UK independent oil and gas production company that produces about 3 million barrels of oil annually and has development plans for oilfields with reserves of almost a billion barrels of oil. Sibir Energy plc was formed in 1996 by its parent, Pentex Energy plc, a UK independent oil and gas company. Founded in 1996 with the specific aim of acquiring substantial and inexpensive reserves of Russian oil in the ground, Sibir had amassed 2.2 billion barrels of recoverable oil by the beginning of 2001. Among the directors of Sibir are Tchigirinskis brother Alexander, Mr. Alexander Betsky (three years of accounting and audit experience with Ernst & Young), Urs J. Haener, Non-Executive Director (and former President and CEO of Credit Suisse-Moscow), Henry O. Cameron, William L. S. Guinness and a few others. Sibirs auditor is Ernst & Young.
In December 2001, a few weeks after the opening of a new pipeline in Uzbekistan, Sibir tried to to merge with the Central Fuel Company that owns a refinery and a big retail network in Moscow region. They announced, that they had acquired a further 20 per cent stake in Yugraneft from Gazprom. Gazprom later had major problems. On March 06, 2002 the Energy News Portal Gas+Oil wrote in their issue, that Gazprom became the "russian ENRON": "...As financial scandals go, this one has everything. A Big Five accounting firm accused of overlooking wildly improper deals in its probes of a client's books. A client that's one of the country's biggest energy firms, and yet is now a symbol for the evils of crony capitalism. The amounts involved? Billions and billions. There's more: Leaked documents, infuriated shareholders, threatened lawsuits. Even the President of the country is angry...:" (Source: gasandoil.com/goc/company/cnr21050.htm
) Auditor of Gazprom was US-company PricewaterhouseCoopers, the world's largest accounting firm, who signed a new CEO, Samuel A. DiPiazza, on January 1st 2002. DiPiazza is contributor of the Beta Alpha Psi Society and in connections with Ernst + Young and Arthur Andersen. Source: www2.uic.edu/stud_orgs/prof/bap/links.html
"...PwC has been signing off on Gazprom's books since 1996, and fed-up shareholders say it is high time to give the job to someone else.." PwC, with over 150,000 people in more than 150 countries incl. Cayman Islands
Back to Sibir: In June 2000 Sibir completed already the acquisition of an additional 62% of Russian oil and gas producing company Evikhon and the first 23.551% from Yugraneft. And Sibneft, in an joint venture with Sibir Energy, hooked up in March 2002 with former Dick Cheney's company Halliburton: gasandoil.com/goc/company/cnr21067.htm
Sibir was part of PSG International, which became the leader
of
the Transcaspian gas pipeline project consortium in February
1999.
(Source:
eurasianet.org/resource/turkmenistan/hypermail/200009/0025.html
Later, the consortium was joined by the British-Dutch Shell
company which took over 50 per cent sponsorship of the project,as
well as responsibility for providing the pipeline with Turkmen raw
gas. The story of Sibir developed successfully in 2002. Tatneft,
the country's number six producer, bought 33% astake in
London-listed Sibir Energy. In July 2002 the UK-based Sibir Energy
and russian Lukoil together with the Latsis Group of Greece,
Rosneft and Sibneft (Russia) bought stakes in Croatia´s INA
Industrija Nafte. Oil-barrel.com reported in August 2002, that
"Sibir took a large step forward in becoming a fully integrated
Russian oil and gas company earlier this year when it finalised
downstream arrangements, which will complement the company's
substantial, but as yet unexploited upstream reserves. Two Russian
groups Tatneft and Corus Holdings announced they were investing in
Sibir. Initially they were to lend US$120 million to Sibir and
subsequently subscribe for ordinary shares in Sibir to the value of
US$240 million (£166 million) at 22.8p a share. Sibir decided
to
concentrate on Russia over two years ago (2000) when a series of
deals with Mr Chalva Tchigirinski, a well known Russia business
man, saw him injecting assets including Priobskoye into Sibir and
ending up with 51 per cent of the company's capital. Sibir has some
production through its Yuzknoye and Orekhovskoye fields but the
amounts are modest. ...The Russian major Sibneft has a 40 per cent
interest in Priobskoye and will be the developer. This is a
long-term venture. In the Salym project there is a 50/50 per cent
joint venture with Shell, essentially to develop two thirds of the
Salym field. ...While these mega deals were going on, Sibir, with
loans due, found it was running out of cash. Accordingly Sibir has
sold its Pentex group of assets onshore the UK. The price received
was US$36 million. Some US$15 million was ringed fenced in a loan
to the Bank of Scotland. ...The deals with Tatneft and Corus mean
between them these two companies will hold 33 per cent of
Sibir.
Source:
www.oil-barrel.com/archives/news_archive/2002/aug-2002/sibir120802.htm
At the end of 2002 it was more than obvious, that the whole "war on terrorism" was in reality a "war on oil" and a battle between US-/UK-, russian (Lukoil->) and french oil (TotalFina ->) industries. Russia and France resisted for many months against the US plans to invade Iraq, who had already oil contracts with Lukoil and TotalFina. It was well known, that Halliburton, Baker Hughes, Schlumberger, Flowserve, Fisher-Rosemount had used subsidiaries and joint venture companies to deal with iraqi oil companies. Source: http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/articles.html?offset=&query=cheney+iraq+halliburton&multiViewArticleId001103000626=001103000626
China (China OGP, chinaogp-online.com/ ) didn't participate in the oil on war yet, because it reaches its mid-1990s OECD level of energy/GDP by 2050. Due to a study, The World Oil Supply 1990-2030, which was completed in late 1995 by the prestigious Geneva, Switzerland- based group Petroconsultants and a second report, prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the Office of Transportation Technology of the U.S. Department of Energy, the world is running out of "cheap oil". By 2050, the 1994 report said, world oil production would drop to 17.5 million barrels a day, or slightly more than it was in the 1950s. "The problem of gradually tightening world oil supplies is exacerbated by a growing concentration of remaining reserves in the Persian Gulf. All other producing countries but the five Persian Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates) will peak before 2000" Source: www.awea.org/wew/684-1.html
In 2000, the CIA released their paper "Global Trends 2015", in
which they described a "cooperation between governments and private
organizations and to the growing reach of international criminal
and terrorist networks" and a "rising demand for OPEC oil". "The
responsibilities of once "semiautonomous" government agencies
increasingly will intersect because of the transnational nature of
national security priorities and because of the clear requirement
for interdisciplinary policy responses." "The potential for
conflict will arise from rivalries in Asia, ranging from
India-Pakistan to China-Taiwan, as well as among the antagonists in
the Middle East" "By 2015, only one-tenth of Persian Gulf oil will
be directed to Western markets; three-quarters will go to Asia."
"The Persian Gulf region-absent a major war-will see large
increases in oil production capacity...Russia and the Middle East
account for three-quarters of known gas reserves." "Developments in
Afghanistan and Pakistan will threaten regional stability."
Source: cia.gov/cia/publications/globaltrends2015/
In January 2001 socialist paper "Wsws" speculated, that
"oil
and
gas pipelines to China from Turkmenistan and
Kazakhstan
could be extended to link into the pipeline networks of both Russia
and Iran".
( Source: wsws.org/articles/2001/jan2001/oil-j03.shtml)
In 1998, US oil company UNOCAL stopped their negotiations with the Taliban to start working on a huge pipeline project. After the war against the Taliban started in late December 2001, one of the former UNOCAL advisors, Zalmay Khalilzad (->), a senior strategist at Rand (->), became a key National Security Council adviser on Afghanistan. French paper LeMonde claimed, that Hamid Karzai, President of Afghanistan worked for UNOCAL, too, as a consultant. It was never proven, if Le Mondes informations had been based on a confusion with Khalilzad, however the ties between him and UNOCAL are true. As the Guardian reported, gas reserves in afghanistan could be 576 trillion cubic feet. guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,579401,00.html
The afghanistan pipeline project was once part of the Cent Gas
Consortium in the Mid90s, at that time supported by ENRON, Conoco,
Halliburton, UNOCAL (all US), PSG International Ltd. (a UK-based
con-sortium of US companies General Electric and Bechtel), and
Shell (UK/The Netherlands). On November 26th, 2001, CNN reported,
that a new pipeline will pump around 600,000 barrels of oil to the
west from Central Asia each day. The $2.6 billion Caspian Pipeline
Consortium (CPC) project runs from the Tengiz oilfield in western
Kazakhstan to Russia
cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/11/26/pipeline.opens/
In February 2002, "...Pakistani President, Gen Pervez Musharraf, and the Afghan interim leader, Mr Hamid Karzai, agreed ... that their two countries should develop "mutual brotherly relations" and co-operate "in all spheres of activity" - including a proposed gas pipeline from Central Asia to Pakistan via Afghanistan. "We have agreed unanimously ... on working together to develop strong brotherly co-operation, brotherly relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan in all spheres of activity," Gen Musharraf said after their talks..." (Source: ireland.com/newspaper/world/2002/0209/448097021FR09KARZAI.html
In November 2000, former CIA director Woolsey,James already explained, that "during the Gulf War, Iraq came close to controlling half the world's oil. This could happen again, he warned." Source: http://journalism.unl.edu/joe/fall00/1101/state4.html
In an January 2003 interview with DER SPIEGEL, Woolsey confirmed, that the war against Iraq is about oil: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,231338,00.html
Q: Also geht es auch diesmal um Öl ... Woolsey: ... aber nicht nur um Amerikas Abhängigkeit vom Öl, sondern um die der ganzen Welt. Auf kurze Sicht liegt unsere grundlegende Verwundbarkeit darin, dass die Saudis die Fördermenge schnell drosseln oder steigern können, weil sie über die Hälfte der weltweiten "swing capacity", insgesamt vier Millionen Barrel, verfügen. Damit haben die Saudis entscheidenden Einfluss auf den Ölpreis. Wir müssen dem Nahen Osten die Ölwaffe wegnehmen.
Compare: stopexxonmobil.org/ (See Truth On Oil Strategy)
Unocal - 9/11 Encyclopedia