9/11Encyclopedia   FakeEvidenceOnIraq
HelpContents Search View

From 911Encyclopedia:

In February/March 2003, many different papers called the "evidence on Iraq" fake, among them Washington Post and BBC. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59403-2003Mar7.html DER SPIEGEL described these methods as "Tonkin lie", ABC as "Questionable Evidence" and CNN argued, that the Fake Iraq documents are "embarrasing for U.S." . In March, 2003, a group of retired CIA-officers started to question the evidence on Iraq as well. One of them, Ray McGovern, a 27-year CIA veteran who briefed top Reagan administration security officials before retiring in 1990, told AP: "It's been cooked to a recipe, and the recipe is high policy...That's why a lot of my former colleagues are holding their noses these days." Sources: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,239340,00.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/2020/GMA030310Iraq_weapons_evidence.html http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/index.html In March 2003, on a request by Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the FBI announced, that they are looking into the forgery of a key piece of evidence linking Iraq to a nuclear weapons program, including the possibility that a foreign government is using a deception campaign to foster support for military action against Iraq. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17888-2003Mar12.html Compare: (See Kamel,Hussein) (See Kucinich,Dennis) (See FakeThreats) (-> Scripted Terror Alerts)


http://www.911review.org:  Home Page, Search.
FindPage Or try one of these actions: LocalSiteMap, of this page (last modified 2003-11-11 05:00:57)