911review.org Homepage

As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (st911.org), I would observe that

our members have established more than a dozen disproofs of the official

government account, the truth of any one of which is enough to show that

the government's account cannot possibly be correct. Here is an overview:

(1) the impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the

buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank

DeMartini, the project manager, has observed), the planes that hit were very

similar to those they were designed to withstand, they continued to stand after

the impact with negligible effects;

(2) the melting point of steel at 2,800*F is about 1,000*F higher than the

maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800*F

under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt,

which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down;

(3) UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for at least six hours

before it would even significantly weaken, where these fires burned too low and

too briefly--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the

North--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt;

(4) if the steel had melted or weakened, the buildings would have displayed

completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which

would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt, and total demolition

that was observed;

(5) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to bring

about the collapse of the next lower floor, even if the impact of the planes and

the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken, which means

that, even if one floor had collapsed due to the impacts and the fires, that

could not have caused lower floors to fall;

(6) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to bring

about the pulverization of the next floor, even if the impact of the planes and

the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken and one floor to

collapse upon another, which required a massive source of energy beyond any that

the government has considered;

(7) the destruction of the South Tower in 10 seconds and of the North in 11 is

even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken 12

seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphaized, is an astounding result that would

have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives;

(8) the towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where

the floors do not move, a phenomenon that Judy Wood has likened to two gigantic

trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the

concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain;

(9) pools of molten metal were found at the subbasement levels three, four, and

five weeks later, an effect that could not have been produced by the

plane-impact/jet-fuel-fire/pancake collapse scenario, which, of course, implies

that it was not produced by such a cause;

(10) WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM/ET after

Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to "pull it",

displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions, including

a complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors

are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to the

official account that it is not even mentioned in THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT;

(11) the hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton

airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the

ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings,

no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means that the

building was not hit by a Boeing 757!

(12) the Pentagon's own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the

building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when it was shown on "The Factor"; but

if a 155-foot long Boeing 757 had hit the building, it should have been present

and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757!

(13) the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory--flying

at high speed barely above ground level--physically impossible; and if it had

come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there

is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the building

was not hit by a Boeing 757!

(14) if Flight 93 had come down as advertised, then there would have been a

debris field of about a city block in size, but in fact the debris is

distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be explainable

if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed as requird

by the government's official scenario.

There are more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they were

not competent to fly the planes; their names were not on any passenger manifest;

they were not subject to any autopsy; several have turned up alive and well; the

cell calls were impossible; on and on. The evidence may be found at st911.org.

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Founder and Co-Chair

Scholars for 9/11 Truth




Scholars for 9/11 Truth

World Trade Center Fireballs 9/11

World trade center building seven demolition video - September 11 attacks

Building 7 Collapse WTC - 9/11 Review

Flight 77 - 9/11 Review

Nerdcities/Guardian - articles and videos - 911review


Stranger Than Fiction (Part2)- September 11 and the Zionists

Pentagon American Airlines Flight  77 - September 11

Nerdcities/Guardian - articles and videos - 911review

Detailed Analysis whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -EXPLOSION AT THE PENTAGON

Video Evidence of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses 9-11

Chapter 5 - WTC Seven - The WTC Report. Tower 7 9/11

'Project Achilles' cell phone experiment on aircraft 911review

guardian video archives 911review

Political Art - Gunpoint Democracy Iraq War

Pentagon Attack Debris 9/11 review

Flight 77 Tower Conversations

Flight 77 Sites - 9-11 Review

Constitution - Just a Goddamned Piece of Paper says President


Brads 9-11 batcave

9/11 Wiki

Flights 11,175,77, and 93

by David Ray Griffin

The 9/11 Commission's Incredible Tales:

9/11 Commission Story Absurd Professor

Emeritus, Morgan Reynolds Ph.D.

sept 11 truth 9 11 facts -

Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney

9/11 Myth Website

911review.org Homepage

Your Ad Here